首页> 外文OA文献 >Identifying Signatures of Selection in Genetic Time Series
【2h】

Identifying Signatures of Selection in Genetic Time Series

机译:识别遗传时间序列中的选择特征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Both genetic drift and natural selection cause the frequencies of alleles ina population to vary over time. Discriminating between these two evolutionaryforces, based on a time series of samples from a population, remains anoutstanding problem with increasing relevance to modern data sets. Even in theidealized situation when the sampled locus is independent of all other locithis problem is difficult to solve, especially when the size of the populationfrom which the samples are drawn is unknown. A standard $\chi^2$-basedlikelihood ratio test was previously proposed to address this problem. Here weshow that the $\chi^2$ test of selection substantially underestimates theprobability of Type I error, leading to more false positives than indicated byits $P$-value, especially at stringent $P$-values. We introduce two methods tocorrect this bias. The empirical likelihood ratio test (ELRT) rejectsneutrality when the likelihood ratio statistic falls in the tail of theempirical distribution obtained under the most likely neutral population size.The frequency increment test (FIT) rejects neutrality if the distribution ofnormalized allele frequency increments exhibits a mean that deviatessignificantly from zero. We characterize the statistical power of these twotests for selection, and we apply them to three experimental data sets. Wedemonstrate that both ELRT and FIT have power to detect selection in practicalparameter regimes, such as those encountered in microbial evolutionexperiments. Our analysis applies to a single diallelic locus, assumedindependent of all other loci, which is most relevant to full-genome selectionscans in sexual organisms, and also to evolution experiments in asexualorganisms as long as clonal interference is weak. Different techniques will berequired to detect selection in time series of co-segregating linked loci.
机译:遗传漂移和自然选择都会导致种群中等位基因的频率随时间变化。基于人口样本的时间序列,区分这两种进化力仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,与现代数据集的相关性越来越高。即使在理想的情况下,当采样的基因座独立于所有其他基因座时,这个问题也很难解决,尤其是当从中抽取样本的人口规模未知时。以前提出了基于$ \ chi ^ 2 $的标准似然比检验来解决此问题。在这里,我们显示选择的$ \ chi ^ 2 $检验大大低估了类型I错误的可能性,导致比其$ P $值所指示的误报更多,尤其是在严格的$ P $值下。我们介绍了两种纠正这种偏差的方法。当似然比统计量落在最可能的中性种群规模下获得的经验分布的尾部时,经验似然比检验(ELRT)拒绝中立性。如果归一化等位基因频率增量的分布表现出均值,则频率增量检验(FIT)拒绝中立性。明显偏离零。我们表征这两个选择的检验的统计能力,并将它们应用于三个实验数据集。希望证明ELRT和FIT都有能力检测实际参数范围内的选择,例如微生物进化实验中遇到的那些。我们的分析适用于假设不依赖于所有其他基因座的单个拨号基因座,这与性生物中的全基因组选择扫描最相关,并且还适用于无性生物的进化实验,只要克隆干扰较弱即可。将需要不同的技术来检测共分离的连锁基因座的时间序列中的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号